Déficit de naturaleza y sobreuso de tecnología en la infancia. Un estudio correlacional por género sobre la influencia en la construcción identitaria sostenible de la infancia
DOI
10.22550/2174-0909.4097
Abstract
This article addresses important aspects of the fragmented bidirectionality between children and nature that currently exists in childhood. The combination of factors to consider as a result of constant socio-environmental crises makes addressing two important points relevant: where children prefer spending their free time and the differences they perceive according to whether the options are more or less artificial/natural; and, on similar lines, whether these decisions and preferences shape other key pieces of their identity, such as their sense of freedom, autonomy, and responsibility. The main aim is to identify their preferences and, based on their perceptions, analyse whether there are differences by gender in how they approach free time: whether they use technology or not, whether they prioritise the street and natural spaces, and whether effects are observed in their identity construction. An anonymous, self-administered quantitative survey using a structured questionnaire was performed. The target population comprised students enrolled in years 5 and 6 of primary school, with a sample of 2586 respondents at a national level. The statistical analysis involved calculating descriptive measures such as means, standard deviations, medians, and interquartile ranges (IR). The Mann-Whitney U test was also applied and Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated. The results, based on a series of correlational analyses, suggest that there are significant differences by gender in preference for use and spaces, as well as differences in the effects of these preferences on their identity. The possibility of new pedagogical demands and responsibilities for social justice in environmental matters emerging remains open.
Financiación | Funding
Project. PID2021-122993NB-I00. Análisis de los procesos de (des-re) conexión con la naturaleza y con la tecnología en la construcción de la identidad infantil NATEC-ID [Analysis of processes of (de-re) connection with nature and with technology in the construction of children’s identity]. Ministry of Science and Innovation. Project. TED2021-130300A-C22. Tecnología disruptiva como catalizadora de la transición ecológica desde la educación ambiental. Estudio y diseño de soluciones tecnoeducativas desde NATUR-TEC Kids LivingLab [Disruptive technology as catalyst of ecological transition from environmental education. Study and design of techno-educational solutions from NATUR-TEC Kids LivingLab]. Ministry of Science and Innovation.
Referencias | References
Adams, D., & Beauchamp, G. (2021). A study of the experiences of children aged 7-11 taking part in mindful approaches in local nature reserves. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2020.1736110
Amoly, E., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., López-Vicente, M., Basagaña, X., Julvez, J., Álvarez-Pedrerol, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., & Sunyer, J. (2014). Green and blue spaces and behavioral development in Barcelona schoolchildren: The BREATHE Project. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(12), 1351-1358. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408215
Änggård, E. (2016). How matter comes to matter in children’s nature play: Posthumanist approaches and children’s geographies. Children’s Geographies, 14(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1004523
Askerlund, P., & Almers, E. (2016). Forest gardens. New opportunities for urban children to understand and develop relationships with other organisms. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20(1), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.08.007
Bisquerra, R., & Pérez-Escoda, N. (2015). ¿Pueden las escalas Likert aumentar en sensibilidad? [Is it possible to improve sensitivity in Likert scales?]. REIRE: revista d’innovació i recerca en educació, 8(2), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2015.8.2828
Caballero, D., Martín, J., & Andrade, L. E. (2024). Unpacking the relationship between screen use and educational outcomes in childhood: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 215, 105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105049
Chiumento, A., Mukherjee, I., Chandna, J., Dutton, C., Rahman, A., & Bristow, K. (2018). A haven of green space: Learning from a pilot pre-post evaluation of a school-based social and therapeutic horticulture intervention with children. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 836. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5661-9
Correa, C., Artiagoitia, M., González, R., & González, A. (2023). Educación al aire libre: clave para el bienestar, desarrollo y aprendizaje de niños y niñas [Outdoor education: Key to children’s well-being, development and learning]. Base, Diseño e Innovación, 8(7), 72-81. https://hdl.handle.net/11447/8503
Cortina, A. (2007). Ética de la razón cordial. Educar en la ciudadanía [Ethics of cordial reason. Educating in citizenship]. Ediciones Nobel.
De Tapia, R., & Salvado, M. (2021). From a deficit of nature to a surplus of technology: The search for compatibility in education. In J. M. Muñoz-Rodríguez (Ed.), Identity in a hyperconnected society. Risk and educative proposals (pp.185-198). Springer.
Díaz-Romanillos, E. (2024). Reimaginando la educación ambiental en la era del antropoceno: una reflexión ética [Re-imagining environmental education in the age of the anthropocene: An ethical reflection]. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 36(2),59-78. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.31794
Figueras, B. M., & Torrents, A. (2022). El futuro está por crear: temporalidad e imaginación en el antropoceno [The future is yet to be created: Temporality and imagination in the anthropocene]. Artnodes, (29), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7238/artnodes.v0i29.392989
García, Á., Vlieghe, J., Muñoz Rodríguez, J. M., & Martín Lucas, J. (2021). Pensar la (teoría de la) educación desde la tecnología de nuestro tiempo [Thinking of (the theory of) education from the technology of our time]. Teoría de la educación. Revista interuniversitaria, 33(2), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.25432
Gaviria, J. L. (2024). ¿Transhumanismo “contra” educación? [Transhumanism “against” education?]. Teoría De La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 36(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.31762
González-Tapia, G., Lazzaro-Salazar, M., & Mundaca, E. A. (2022). A (geo-) narrative analysis of children’s perceptions of wellbeing in relation to nature as the basis for educational intervention planning. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221097398
Guerra, M., Villa, F. V., & Glaveanu, V. P. (2021). Creativity and outdoor education in primary schools: A review of the literature. RELAdEI: Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Infantil, 10(1), 91-107. https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/reladei/article/view/7671
Guevara-Arayón, R. (2020). Género, tecnología y educación: un estudio de caso sobre las diferencias de género en el uso de las TIC [Gender, technology and education: A case study of the gender differences in the use of ICT]. Revista Peruana de Investigación Educativa, 12(12), 89-122. https://doi.org/10.34236/rpie.v12i12.147
Gutiérrez-Pérez, B. M., Ruedas, J., Caballero, D., & Murciano, A. B. (2024). La conexión con la naturaleza como factor clave en la formación de las identidades infantiles: una revisión sistemática [Connection with nature as a key factor in the formation of childhood identities: A systematic review]. Teoría de la educación, 36(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.31397
Haraway, D. J. (2020). Seguir con el problema: generar parentesco en el chthuluceno [Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the chthulucene]. Consonni.
Humphreys, C., & Blenkinsop, S. (2018). Ecological identity, empathy, and experiential learning: A young child’s explorations of a nearby river. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2018.20
Huynh, O., Craig, W., Janssen, I., & Pickett, W. (2013). Exposure to public natural space as a protective factor for emotional well-being among young people in Canada. BMC Public Health, (13), 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-407
Jarvis, I., Sbihi, H., Davis, Z., Brauer, M., Czekajlo, A., Davies, H., Gergel, S., Guhn, M., Jerrett, M., Koehoorn, M., Nesbitt, L., Oberlander, T., Su, J., & van den Bosch, M. (2022). The influence of early-life residential exposure to different vegetation types and paved surfaces on early childhood development: A population-based birth cohort study. Environment International, 163, 107196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107196
Kuchta, E. C. (2022). Rewilding the imagination: Teaching ecocriticism in the change times. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 25, 190-206. https://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/article/view/1696
Latour, B. (2022). Nunca fuimos modernos. Ensayos de antropología simétrica [We have never been modern. Essays in the anthropology of symmetry author]. Clave intelectual.
L’Ecuyer, C., Oron, J.V., Montiel, I. Osorio, A., López-Fidalgo, J., & Salmerón, M. A. (in-press). Cuestionando el desafío a las recomendaciones sobre el uso de pantallas [Defying the challenge to recommendations on the use of displays]. Teoría de la educación. Revista Interuniversitaria.
Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press.
Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books.
Luís, S., Dias, R., & Lima, M. L. (2020). Greener schoolyards, greener futures? Greener schoolyards buffer decreased contact with nature and are linked to connectedness to nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 567882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567882
Marcelo, C., Yot-Domínguez, C., Marcelo, P., Murillo, P., & Mayor-Ruiz, C. (2022). No me llames influencer. Nuevos artesanos digitales en educación [Do not call me influencer. New digital artisans in education]. Campus Virtuales, 11(2), 133-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.54988/cv.2022.2.1150
Martín, J., & Muñoz, J.M. (2023). La (des-re)conexión con la naturaleza y la tecnología como fenómenos educativos. ¿Qué nos hace más humanos? [The (dis-re)connection with nature and technology as educational phenomena. What makes us more human?]. In A. Cámara, A. Runte, D., Amber, & D. Martín (Coords.), Educación: encuentros y desencuentros [Education: Encounters and misunderstandings] (pp. 178-182). Universidad de Jaén.
Martínez, A. (2023). La política del antropoceno. Hacia un fundamento común de las responsabilidades planetarias [The politics of the anthropocene. Towards a common foundation of planetary responsibilities]. DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos, (49), 115-152. https://doi.org/10.20318/dyl.2023.7721
Misiaszek, G. W. (2023). Ecopedagogy: Freirean teaching to disrupt socio-environmental injustices, anthropocentric dominance, and unsustainability of the Anthropocene. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(11), 1253-1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2130044
Muñoz-Rodríguez, J. M. (2021). Identity in a hyperconnected society: Risks and educative proposals. Springer.
Muñoz-Rodríguez, J. M. (2022). Del déficit de naturaleza hacia una pedagogía de las cosas de la naturaleza [From the nature deficit to a pedagogy of the things of nature]. In A. García (Coord.), La pedagogía de las cosas: quiebras de la educación de hoy [The pedagogy of things: Failures in education today] (pp. 395-402). Octaedro.
Mycock, K. (2019). Playing with mud: Becoming stuck, becoming free? The negotiation of gendered/class identities when learning outdoors. Children’s Geographies, 17(4), 454-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1546379
Naes, A. (1986). The deep-ecology movement: Some philosophical aspects. Philosophical Inquiry, 8(1-2), 10-31. https://doi.org/10.5840/philinquiry198681/22
Pattier, D. (2021). Referentes educativos durante la pandemia de la COVID-19. El éxito de los edutubers [Educational references during the COVID-19 pandemic. The success of the edutubers]. Publicaciones, 51(3), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v51i3.18080
Paulsen, M., Jagodzinski, J., & M. Hawke, S. (Eds.). (2022). Pedagogy in the anthropocene: Rewilding education for a new Earth. Springer International Publishing.
Payne, P. G., & Wattchow, B. (2008). Slow pedagogy and placing education in post-traditional outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 1, 25-38.
Pollin, S., & Retzlaff-Fürst, C. (2021). The school garden: A social and emotional place. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 567720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567720
Sabater, C., & Fernández, J. B. (2015). No sin mi móvil. Diferencias de género y uso de las nuevas tecnologías [Not without my phone. Gender differences and use of new technologies]. Icon14, 13(1), 208-246. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v13i1.722
Serrate, S., Sánchez, A, Andrade, L. E., & Muñoz, J. M. (2023). Identidad onlife: la cuestión del género y la edad en el comportamiento adolescente ante las redes [Onlife identity: The question of gender and age in teenagers’ online behaviour]. Comunicar, 31(75), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C75-2023-01
Shahjahan, R. A. (2015). Being lazy and slowing down: Toward decolonizing time, our body, and pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 488-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.880645
Squillacioti, G., Carsin, A. E., Bellisario, V., Bono, R., & García-Aymerich, J. (2022). Multisite greenness exposure and oxidative stress in children. The potential mediating role of physical activity. Environmental Research, 209, 112857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112857
Sosa, N. M. (2000). Ética ecológica: entre la falacia y el reduccionismo [Ecological ethics: Between fallacy and reductionism]. Laguna. Revista de Filosofía, (7), 307-327.
Stratford, R. (2019). Educational philosophy, ecology and the anthropocene. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(2), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1403803
Tafalla, M. (2022). Filosofía ante la crisis ecológica. Una propuesta de convivencia con las demás especies: decrecimiento, veganismo y rewilding [Philosophy in the face of the ecological crisis. A proposal for coexistence with other species: Degrowth, veganism and rewilding]. Plaza y Valdés.
Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1448-1461 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452
Todd, S. (2024). Ecología de encuentros: la lógica del compostaje como respuesta educativa al colapso ambiental [Ecology of encounters: The logic of composting as an educational response to environmental collapse]. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 36(2), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.31915
Villas, F. (2023). Cómo las pantallas devoran a nuestros hijos [How screens are devouring our children]. Herder.
Wilson, R. (2019). What is nature? International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 7(1), 26-39.
Citación recomendada | Recommended citation
Serrate-González, S., Alonso-del-Casar, J., Patino-Alonso, C., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, J. M. (2025). Nature deficit and technology overuse in childhood. A correlational study by gender of its influence on sustainable identity construction in childhood [Déficit de naturaleza y sobreuso de tecnología en la infancia. Un estudio correlacional por género sobre la influencia en la construcción identitaria sostenible de la infancia]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 83(290). https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.4097
Licencia Creative Commons | Creative Commons License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Included in
Palabras clave | Keywords
nature deficit, technology surplus, childhood, identity, autonomy, freedom, responsibility