El feedback entre iguales y el desarrollo profesional docente: revisión sistemática
DOI
10.22550/2174-0909.4044
Abstract
The potential of professional collaboration as a mechanism for teacher professional development (TPD) lies in the feedback opportunities it offers. Although feedback itself has been extensively researched, most studies focus on the teacher-student relationship. In this sense, literature reviews have paid scant attention to teacher-teacher feedback in a symmetrical relationship and its impact on TPD. Consequently, 30 peer-reviewed empirical articles were selected from 2012 to 2022 in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. The process consisted of three phases: document search and evaluation using the VOSViewer tool; selection and filtering of documents according to the defined criteria, and document analysis. The results show that all research on teacher- teacher feedback concludes that it improves learning, the relationship between teaching partners and school climate. The main difficulty identified relates to teachers’ lack of skills in providing quality feedback. Few articles analysed the impact of feedback on teaching and learning methodologies(although all highlighted positive benefits) and even fewer studies analysed its impact on TPD. In turn, recommendations for improving research and practice in schools are proposed.
Referencias | References
The references marked with an asterisk indicate that the article was included in the systematic review.
Adcroft, A. (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research and Development, 30 (4), 405-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.526096
*Alam, J., & Aamir, S. M., & Shahzad, S. (2020). Continuous professional development of secondary school teachers through peer observation: Implications for policy and practice. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 1 (1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss1-2020(56-75)
Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In S. Askew (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 1-18). Routledge.
*Ben-Peretz, M., Gottlieb, E., & Gideon, I. (2018). Coaching between experts - Opportunities for teachers’ professional development. Teacher Development, 22 (3), 303-313. http://dx.doi.org/º10.1080/13664530.2018.1438310
Bolívar, A. (2014). La autoevaluación en la construcción de capacidades de mejora de la escuela como comunidad de aprendizaje profesional [Self-evaluation in building school improvement capacities as a professional learning community]. Revista Portuguesa De Investigação Educacional, (14), 9-40. https://doi.org/10.34632/investigacaoeducacional.2014.3398
*Butler, &. G., & Yeum, K. (2016). Dialogic competence of primary school English teachers in online peer coaching: A case study in South Korea. Journal of Asia TEFL, 13 (2), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2016.13.2.1.72
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43 (8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge international handbook of educational effectiveness and improvement. Routledge.
*Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2013). Second look - second think: A freshlook vídeo to support dialogic feedback in peer coaching. Professional Development in Education, 39 (2), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.753931
*Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2014). Dialogic peer coaching as teacher leadership for professional inquiry. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3 (2), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2013-0022
*Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2015). Teacher agency and dialogic feedback: Using classroom data for practitioner enquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.006
*Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2016). Professional learning as diffractive practice: Rhizomatic peer coaching. Reflective Practice, 17 (5), 544-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1184632
Cravens, X. C., & Hunter, S. B. (2021). Assessing the impact of collaborative inquiry on teacher performance and effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32 (4), 564-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1923532
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
De la Iglesia, B. & Rosselló, M. R. (2018). Aplicación del sistema internacional de observación y feedback docente (ISTOF-II) en un contexto educativo no anglosajón [Application of IST- OF-II System in no-Anglo-Saxon educational context]. REICE: Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 16 (1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2018.16.1.006
Doan, L. (2013). Is feedback a waste of time? The students’ perspective. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 1 (2), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v1i2.69
Dos Santos, M. (2016). Calidad y satisfacción: el caso de la Universidad de Jaén [Quality and satisfaction: The case of the University of Jaén]. Revista de la Educación Superior, 45 (178), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2016.02.005
Duran, D. (2019). Aprendizaje docente entre iguales: maestros y escuelas que aprenden unos de otros [Peer-to-peer teacher learning: Teachers and schools learning from each other]. Àmbits de Psicopedagogia i Orientació, (50), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.32093/ambits.v0i50.1219
*Duran, D., Miquel, E., & Corcelles, M. (2020). La observación entre iguales como mecanismo de desarrollo profesional docente: la percepción de los participantes de la Xarxa de Competències Bàsiques [Peer observation as a teacher professional development mechanism: The perception of participants in Xarxa de Competències Bàsiques]. Àmbits de Psicopedagogia i Orientació, (53), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.32093/ambits.vi53.2636
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103 (4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Escudero, J. M., Cutanda, M. T., & Trillo, F. (2017). Aprendizaje docente y desarrollo profesional del profesorado [Teacher learning and teacher professional development]. Profesorado: Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 21(3), 83-102. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/59790
Esteve, O., Alsina, Á., y Melief, K. (Coords.). (2011). Creando mi profesión: una propuesta para el desarrollo profesional del profesorado [Creating my profession: An approach to teacher professional development]. Octaedro.
García-Jiménez, E. (2015). La evaluación del aprendizaje: de la retroalimentación a la autorregulación. El papel de las tecnologías [Assessment of learning: From feedback to self-regulation. The role of technology]. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 21 (2). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.2.7546
García-Sanpedro, M. J. (2012). Feedback y feedforward: estrategias de mejora para la evaluación continua [Feedback and feedforward: Improvement strategies for continuous evaluation]. En Jornada d’innovació docent UPC: presentació de resultats dels projectes de millora de la docència [UPC teaching innovation day: presentation of the results of teaching improvement projects] (351-359). RIMA; UPC-ICE. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2099/12773/18- GRAPA-4-MJGarciaSanPedro-351-359.pdf
Garello, M. V., & Rinaudo, M. C. (2013). Autorregulación del aprendizaje, feedback y transferencia de conocimiento. Investigación de diseño con estudiantes universitarios [Self-regulation of learning, feedback and knowledge transfer. Design research with university students]. REDIE, Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 15 (2), 131-147. https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/451
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. CorwinPress.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). El poder de la retroalimentación [The power of feedback]. Review Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
*Huber, S. G. (2013). Multiple learning approaches in the professional development of school leaders: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings on self-assessment and feedback. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 41 (4), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213485469
*Ivarsson, L. (2019). What’s in it for me? Peer observation of teaching: Experiences from a primary school in Sweden. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18 (3), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.3.7
*Jao, L. (2013). Peer coaching as a model for professional development in the elementary mathematics context: Challenges, needs and rewards. Policy Futures in Education, 11 (3), 290-298. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.3.290
*Johnston, A. L., Baik, C., & Chester, A. (2022). Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: A systematic review. Higher Education Research and Development, 41 (2), 390-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1845124
Krichesky, G. J., & Murillo, F. J. (2018). La colaboración docente como factor de aprendizaje y promotor de mejora. Un estudio de casos [Teacher collaboration as a factor for learning and school improvement. A case study]. Educación XX1, 21 (1), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.20181
*Kunemund, R. L., Kennedy, M. J., Carlisle, L. M., VanUitert, V. J., & McDonald, S. D. (2022). A multimedia option for delivering feedback and professional development to teachers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37 (2), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211004121
*Limbere, A. M., Munakata, M., Klein, E. J., & Taylor, M. (2022). Exploring the tensions science teachers navigate as they enact their visions for science teaching: what their feedback can tell us. International Journal of Science Education, 44 (12), 1897-1915. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105413
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford UniversityPress. Lizasoain, L., Tourón, J., & Sobrino, Á. (2015). La evaluación del profesorado español y el impacto del feedback en las prácticas docentes. Análisis de TALIS 2013 [Teacher evaluation in Spain and the impact of feedback on teaching practices. Analysis of TALIS 2013]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 73 (262), 465-481. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.2639
Mclean, A., Bond, C., & Nicholson, H. (2014). An anatomy of feedback: A phenomenographic investigation of undergraduate students’ conceptions of feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40 (5), 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.855718
Mejía, M. R. (2011). Educación(es) en la(s) globalización(es): entre el pensamiento único y la nueva crítica [Education(s) in globalization(s): Between uniform thinking and the new critique]. Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades, Fondo Editorial. https://repositorio.uch.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12872/38
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7 (9), 889-896. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
*Mouraz, A., Pinto, D., & Torres, C. A. (2022). Effects of a model for multidisciplinary peer observation of teaching in teacher professional development and in nurturing a reflective school. Reflective Practice, 24 (1), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2130225
*Murphy, R., Weinhardt, F., & Wyness, G. (2021). Who teaches the teachers? A RCT of peer-to-peer observation and feedback in 181 schools. Economics of Education Review, 82, 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102091
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
*O’Leary, M. (2012). Exploring the role of lesson observation in the English education system: A review of methods, models and meanings. Professional Development in Education, 38 (5), 791-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.693119
O’Leary, M. (2020). Classroom Observation. A guide to effective observation of teaching and learning (2.nd ed.). Routledge.
O’Leary, M., & Savage, S. (2020). Breathing new life into the observation of teaching and learning in higher education: Moving from the performative to the informative. Professional Development in Education, 46 (1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1633386
OECD. (2014). Education at a glance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19991487
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/23129638
O’Mahony, C., & Schwartz, B. (2018). Peer observation consortium creation and implementation. Center for English Language Education Journal, (26), 37-52.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas [The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews]. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74 (9), 790-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016
Pancsofar, N., & Petroff, J. G. (2013). Professional development experiences in co-teaching: Associations with teacher confidence, interests, and attitudes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36 (2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412474996
*Parr, J. M., & Hawe, E. (2017). Facilitating real-time observation of, and peer discussion and feedback about, practice in writing classrooms. Professional development in education, 43 (5), 709-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1241818
*Perry, T., Davies, P., & Brady, J. (2020). Using vídeo clubs to develop teachers’ thinking and practice in oral feedback and dialogic teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50 (5), 615-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/030576 4X.2020.1752619
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley y Sons.
Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2016). Teacher’s professional agency - A relational approach to teacher learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 2 (2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1181196
Pinya, C., De la Iglesia, B., Verger, S., & Rosselló, M. R. (2020). Diseño, aplicación y valoración del feedback formativo para la tutorización del TFG [Design, application, and assessment of formative feedback in final degree project]. Magister: revista de formación del profesorado e investigación educativa, 32 (1), 1-8. https:// doi.org/10.17811/msg.32.1.2020.1-8
Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency and learning - From adaption to active modification in the teacher community. Teachers and Teaching, 21 (7), 811-830. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995483
Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., Remesal, A., & Gonçalves, C. (2021). The challenge of inclusive dialogic teaching in public secondary school. Comunicar, 29 (67), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-02
*Ridge, B. L., & Lavigne, A. L. (2020). Improving instructional practice through peer observation and feedback: A review of the literature. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28 (61), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5023
Rodríguez, G., Ibarra, M. S., & García-Jiménez, E. (2013). Autoevaluación, evaluación entre iguales y coevaluación: conceptualización y práctica en las universidades españolas [Self-assessment, peer assessment, and co-assessment: Conceptualization and practice in Spanish universities]. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 11 (2), 198-210. https://revistas.uvigo.es/index.php/reined/article/view/1958
*Rosselló, M. R., & De la Iglesia, B. (2021). Peer feedback and its impact on professional teaching development. Revista Complutense de Educación, 32 (3), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.70173
Sanmartí, N. (2010). Avaluar per aprendre. L’avaluació per millorar els aprenentatges de l’alumnat en el marc del currículum per competències [Assess to learn. Assessment to improve student learning within the framework of the competency-based curriculum]. Generalitat de Catalunya.
Shortland, S. (2010). Feedback within peer observation: Continuing professional development and unexpected consequences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47 (3), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498181
Silva-Peña, I. (2007). Condiciones y contextos en torno al desarrollo profesional docente producido a través de la investigación-acción [Conditions and contexts around teacher professional development produced through action research] [Doctoral Thesis]. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
*Singh, K., & Mueller, J. (2021). Taking a nuanced view of the role of teacher feedback in the elementary classroom. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 27 (1-4), 95-115. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1933415
*Smith, R., & Lynch, D., (2014). Improving teaching through coaching, mentoring and feedback: A review of literature. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, 4 (2), 136-166. https://mierjs.in/index.php/mjestp/article/view/1467
Stoll, L. (2015). Using evidence, learning and the role of professional learning communities. In C. Brown (Ed.), Leading evidence use in schools (pp. 54-65). IOE Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
*Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2012). Investigating feedback on practice among teachers: Coherence of observed and perceived feedback. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20 (4), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.725981
Todd, M. A. (2017). Peer observation as a tool for professional development. Culminating Projects in English, 84. https://repository.stcloud- state.edu/engl_etds/84/
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational psychology, 25 (6), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
*Torres, A. C., Lopes, A., Valente, J. M. S., & Mouraz, A. (2017). What catches the eye in class observation? Observers’ perspectives in a multidisciplinary peer observation of teaching program. Teaching in Higher Education, 22 (7), 822-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1301907
*Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2014). Improving teacher feedback during active learning: Effects of a professional development program. American Educational Research Journal, 51 (4), 772-809. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531322
*Van der Lans, R. M., Van de Grift, W. J. C. M., Van Veen, K., & Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. (2016). Once is not enough: Establishing reliability criteria for feedback and evaluation decisions based on classroom observations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.001
Van Gennip, N., Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. (2010). Reactions to 360° feedback: The role of trust and trust-related variables. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 10 (4), 362-379. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2010.036088
*Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F., & Simons, R. J. (2015). Promoting effective teacher-feedback: From theory to practice through a multiple component trajectory for professional development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21 (8), 990-1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1005868
Vygotsky, L. S., y Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University press.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
*Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2020). Developing a formative assessment protocol to support professional growth. Educational Assessment, 25 (4), 314-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teachi
Erratum
The first version of the available PDFs of this article contained an incorrect DOI: 10.22550/10.22550/2174-0909.4044. This error has now been corrected. The current PDFs contain the correct DOI: 10.22550/2174-0909.4044.
Citación recomendada | Recommended citation
De la Iglesia, B., Forteza, D., & Duma, L. (2024). Peer feedback in teacher professional development: A systematicreview [El feedback entre iguales y el desarrollo profesional docente: revisión sistemática]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 82 (288), 335-358. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.4044
Licencia Creative Commons | Creative Commons License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Palabras clave | Keywords
teacher professional development, peer feedback, systematic review, teacher agency, basic education
