Different studies show that western soci­ety is living at a frenetic pace. Paradoxically, despite having many tools for managing and saving time, we find that we increasingly have less of it. To challenge this dizzying en­vironment, movements have arisen that seek to rebel against this accelerated pace, such as the so-called ‘slow movement’. The edu­cational field is not oblivious to this problem and pedagogical initiatives and approaches have arisen that try to combat said pace at school level, including the so-called ‘slow ed­ucation’. Based on a study carried out in Italy on Pedagogia della Lumaca, devised by the teacher, Gianfranco Zavalloni, an attempt is made to develop his pedagogy by identifying those who influenced his educational pro­posal, known in Spain as La Pedagogía del Caracol (Pedagogy of the Snail). Further­more, this study also aims to reveal how the proposal could be established, identify the principles on which it would be based and to outline some of its educational purposes. The study has been carried out under a qualita­tive methodology, through techniques such as a bibliographic and documentary review of Zavalloni’s works, and several interviews with his closest personal and professional acquaintances. According to the data obtained, it can be said that, more than an approach, a pedagogical model or a methodology, it is a pedagogical trend from which an educational method, from a child-centred perspective, can be established. As with slow education, one of the aims of Pedagogy of the Snail is to offer a framework to those pedagogues who value time in education and who seek to provide their children with the values required to be masters of their own time.

Please, cite this article as follows: Sánchez-Serrano, S. (2021). La Pedagogía del Caracol. Una rebelión a favor de la lentitud | Pedagogy of the Snail: A rebellion in favour of slowness. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 79 (279), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP79-2-2021-03

Abadzi, H. (2007). Absenteeism and beyond: Instructional time loss and consequences. The World Bank. Independent Evaluation Group.

Ariès, P. (1987). El niño y la vida familiar en el Antiguo Régimen [The child and family life in the Ancien Régime]. Taurus.

Britton, L. (2000). Jugar y aprender: el método Montessori [Play and learn: the Montessori method]. Paidós.

Bruce, T., Elfer, P., Powell, S., & Werth, L. (2018). The Routledge international handbook of Froebel and early childhood practice: Re-articulating research and policy. Routledge.

Burbules, N. C. (2020). Slowness as a virtue. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54 (5) 1443-1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752. 12495

Caride, J. A. (2012). Lo que el tiempo educa: el ocio como construcción pedagógica y so­cial [What time educates: Leisure as a pe­dagogical and social construction]. Arbor, 188 (754), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.3989/ arbor.2012.754n2004

Carnoy, M. (2010). La ventaja académica de Cuba ¿Por qué los estudiantes cubanos rin­den más? [Cuba’s academic advantage. Why do Cuban students perform better?] Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64 (8), 723-733.

Claxton, G. (1999). Cerebro de liebre, mente de tortuga: Por qué aumenta nuestra inteligen­cia cuando pensamos menos [Hare’s brain, tortoise’s mind: Why our intelligence increases when we think less]. Urano.

DeMause, Ll. (1991). Historia de la infancia [Childhood History]. Alianza.

Euronews (2015, June 12 ). Luces y sombras de la educación lenta [Lights and shadows of slow Education]. Euronews. https://bit.ly/3kSGuEb

Fisher, Ch., & Berliner, D. (1985). Perspectives on Instructional Time. Longman.

Guerra, M., & Zuccoli, F. (2017). Le cose dei maestri [Teachers’ matters]. In S. Annic­chiarico (Ed.), Giro Giro Tondo. Design for Children (pp. 360-363). Electa. https://bit.ly/3iM1Hhs

Heidegger, M. (2002). Serenidad [Serenity]. El Serbal

Holt, M. (2002). It’s time to start the slow school movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 84 (4), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400404

Honoré, C. (2005). Elogio de la lentitud [In praise of slowness]. RBA.

Levstik, L. (2014). What can history and the so­cial sciences contribute to civic education? In P. Pagès & A. Santisteban (Eds.), Una mirada al pasado y un proyecto de futuro. Investigación e innovación en la didáctica de las ciencias sociales (pp. 43-51). Servei de Publicacions de la UAB/AUPDCS.

Lewis, T. E. (2017). Study time: Heidegger and the temporality of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51 (1), 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12208

Magnolini, A. (2013). Le mani per scoprire il mondo [Hands to discover the world]. In S. Fenizi, C. Cavalli, & D. Amadori (Coord.), Disegnare la vita. I modi di Gianfranco Za­valloni (pp. 10-23). Fulmino.

Mattozzi, I. (2002). Presentazione per il docen­te. La formazione del pensiero temporale negli adolescenti [Teacher presentations. The development of temporal thinking in adolescents.]. In E. Perillo (Ed.), La storia. Istruzione per luso. Materiali per la forma­zione de competenze temporali degli studenti (pp. 9-22). Tecnodid.

Michelini, M. C. (2017b). La libertà del tempo [The freedom of time]. In L’eredità dei gran­di maestri. Storie di un passato da riscoprire per rispondere alle sfide del presente (pp. 28- 31). Centro Alberto Manzi.

Montessori, M. (1913). Il metodo della peda­gogia scientifica applicato nelle Case dei Bambini [The method of scientific pedagogy applied in Children’s Homes]. Loescher.

Moreu, A. (2014). La recepción española de la pedagogía positivista italiana [The Spanish reception of Italian positivist pedagogy]. In J. M. Hernández (Coord.), Influencias italia­nas en la educación española e iberoamerica­na (pp. 117-137). FahrenHouse.

Pagès, J., & Santisteban, A. (2008). Cambios y continuidades: aprender la temporalidad histórica [Changes and continuities: learning historical temporality]. In M. A. Jara (Comp.), Enseñanza de la historia. Debates y propuestas (pp. 91-124). Educo.

Pérez, P. (1993). El tiempo antropológico [The anthropological time]. In P. Fermoso (Coord.), El tiempo educativo y escolar: es­tudio interdisciplinar (pp. 71-72). Promocio­nes y Publicaciones Universitarias, PPU.

Quiroga, P., & Sánchez-Serrano, S. (2019). La educación lenta en perspectiva histórica: conceptualización, desarrollo y concreción en las iniciativas de Madre de día Waldorf en España [Slow education in historical perspective: conceptualisation, development and concretisation in the Waldorf Day Mother initiatives in Spain]. Educació i Història: Revista d’Història de l’Educació, 34, 121- 147. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.3009.01.232

Rabitti, A. (2013). Costruire con la semplicità. Tecnologia, natura è società [Building with simplicity. Technology, nature and society]. In S. Fenizi, C. Cavalli, & D. Amadori (Coord.), Disegnare la vita. I modi di Gian­franco Zavalloni (pp. 29-38). Fulmino.

Ramos, R. (1992). Tiempo y sociedad [Time and society]. CIS.

Ritscher, P. (2017). La escuela slow. La pedago­gía de lo cotidiano [The slow school. The pe­dagogy of the everyday]. Octaedro.

Scheerens, J. (Ed.) (2014). Effectiveness of Time Investments in Education. Insights from a Review and Meta-Analysis. Springer.

Shuffelton, A. (2017). Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the mechanised clock and children’s time. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51 (4), 837-849. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12246

Tabellini, F. (2012, May 22). Intervista a Gian­franco Zavalloni [Gianfranco Zavallonni Interview]. Decrescita felice social network. http://www.decrescita.com/news/intervista-a-gianfranco-zavalloni/

Zavalloni, G. (1996) La scuola ecológica [The ecological school]. Macro.

Zavalloni, G. (2008b). La pedagogía del caracol. Por una escuela lenta y no violenta [The pe­dagogy of the snail. For a slow and non-vio­lent school]. Graô.

Zavalloni, G. (2009a). Gianfranco Zavalloni’s le­tter to Mario Lodi. Consulted in the family archives, Cesena, 2017.

Silvia Sánchez-Serrano. PhD in education from the Universidad Com­plutense de Madrid. She has worked as a FPU researcher for the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport at the De­partment of Educational Studies in the Education Faculty (UCM) and has been a visiting researcher in universities in Eu­rope and Latin America. She is currently working as a professor of the Department of Education at the Universidad Antonio de Nebrija. She is a member of the con­solidated UCM research group, ‘Cultura Cívica y Políticas Educativas’. Her most recent publications and lines of research focus on civic education, educative time and alternative pedagogy and their ef­fects on comprehensive childhood devel­opment.



Data collected by PlumX Metrics. More information on the metrics collected can be found at https://plumanalytics.com/learn/about-metrics/