Un profesor particular a tiempo completo: ChatGPT desde el punto de vista de los estudiantes universitarios
DOI
10.22550/2174-0909.4160
Abstract
Over the last decades, the emergence of new technologies has brought changes in all areas of social life, including the education sector. Among those, artificial intelligence (AI), after many years playing a secondary role, has recently positioned itself as one with the most capacity for disruption. The newest AI tools have the potential to meaningfully transform various education areas, particularly at the university level. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the opinions of media students from Spain and Serbia on the use of ChatGPT in the learning process. The aim of the work is to determine the similarities and differences in the opinions of students in relation to the following aspects: intention to use, benefits and challenges and potential for personalised learning. A qualitative research method, with structured written interview, was used on a sample of 40 students of the initial years of media studies from universities in both countries. The results indicate that there are similarities and differences in the opinions of media students about using ChatGPT for learning. The findings provide insight into the opinions of media students as key subjects in the learning process and can be a starting point for further research aimed at understanding the role of AI tools and their application in higher education.
Financiación | Funding
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovations of the Republic of Serbia (contract No. 451-03- 66/2024-03). This article is part of the R+D+i project PID2021-128875NA-I00, funded by MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033/”ERDF A way of making Europe”.
Referencias | References
Addington, S. (2023, May 9). ChatGPT: Cybersecurity threats and countermeasures. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4425678
Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15 (3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3 (2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184
Alshater, M. M. (2023, January 4). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing academic performance: A case study of ChatGPT. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312358
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. DigitalCommons@URI, University of Rhode Island. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548
Ausat, A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: A fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 5 (4), 16100-16106. https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/2745
Avila-Chauvet, L., & Mejía, D. (2023, March 4). Can professors and students detect ChatGPT essays? SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4373643
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, O. L. (2023, April 13). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
Baskara, F. R. (2023). The promises and pitfalls of using ChatGPT for self-determined learning in higher education: An argumentative review. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIM Sinjai, 2, 95-101. https://doi.org/10.47435/sentikjar.v2i0.1825
Biswas, S. (2023a, March 31). The function of ChatGPT in social media: According to ChatGPT. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4405389
Biswas, S. (2023b, June 4). Role of ChatGPT in education. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4369981
Borsos, É., Banos-González, I., Boric, E., Lyngved, R., & Fekete, A. B. (2022). Trainee teachers’ perceptions of outdoor education. Environmental Education Research, 28 (10), 1490-1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2031901
Boyon, N. (2022). Opinions about AI vary depending on countries’ level of economic development. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/en/global-opinions-about-ai-january-2022
Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18 (1), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7716416
Brkanlić, S., Sánchez-García, J., Esteve, E. B., Brkić, I., Ćirić, M., Tatarski, J., Gardašević, J., & Petrović, M. (2020). Marketing mix instruments as factors of improvement of students’ satisfaction in higher education institutions in Republic of Serbia and Spain. Sustainability, 12 (18), 7802. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187802
Corbí, M., Tombolato, M., Bueno-Sánchez, L., Hermans, K., Valenti, A., Garcés, J., Straniero, A. M., Brojčin, B. B., Mesquita, C., Bonifácio, E., Martini, B., Rodríguez, S., Milants, M., Glumbić P., & Glumbić, N. (2021). Intellectual disability in higher education: Self-perceived training needs of university teachers. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 20 (1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh20-31002
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61 (2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y., Gasevic, D., & Chen, G. (2023, July 5). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/hcgzj
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40 (2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
Despotovic, D., Cvetanovic, S., Nedic, V., Despotovic, M. (2019). Social aspects of sustainable competitiveness in the selected European countries in the period 2012-2015. Social Indicators Research, 141, 841-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1840-4
Dhiman, B. (2022, 23 de octubre). Artificial intelligence and voice assistant in media studies: A critical review. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4250795
Dolenec, D., Balković, A., Kralj, K., Širinić, D., Romanos, E., & Fernandes, T. (2020). Protest event dataset for Croatia, Portugal, Serbia and Spain: Focus on strike data. Politička misao: časopis za politologiju, 57 (4), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.57.4.07
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., […] y Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V., & Bello, A. O. (2018). The utilisation of e-learning facilities in the educational delivery system of Nigeria: a study of M-University. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15 (34), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0116-z
Ezquerra, A., Agen, F., Rodríguez-Arteche, I., Ezquerra-Romano, I. (2022). Integrating artificial intelligence into research on emotions and behaviors in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18 (4), em2099. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11927
Ezquerra, A., Agen, F., Toma, R. B., Ezquerra-Romano, I. (2023). Using facial emotion recognition to research emotional phases in an inquiry-based science activity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2232995
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61 (3), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Fedorov, A., & Levitskaya, A. (2015). The framework of Media Education and Media Criticism in the Contemporary World: The opinion of International Experts. (Situación de la educación en medios y la competencia crítica en el mundo actual: opinión de expertos internacionales). Comunicar, 23 (45), 107-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-11
Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12 (1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
Frye, B. L. (2022). Should using an AI text generator to produce academic writing be plagiarism? Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Forthcoming, 33 (4), 5. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol33/iss4/5
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of artificial intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, 24, e31279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
Haensch, A. C., Ball, S., Herklotz, M., & Kreuter, F. (2023, March 9). Seeing ChatGPT through students’ eyes: An analysis of TikTok data. arXiv:2303.05349v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.05349
Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2 (4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089
Hariri, W. (2023, April 17). Unlocking the potential of ChatGPT: A comprehensive exploration of its applications, advantages, limitations, and future directions in natural language processing. arXiv:2304.02017v10. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02017
Health, T. L. D. (2023). ChatGPT: Friend or foe? The Lancet: Digital health, 5 (3), e102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00023-7
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In C. Stückelberger, & P. Duggal (Eds.), Data ethics: Building trust. How digital technologies can serve humanity [Ética de los datos: construir la confianza. Cómo las tecnologías digitales pueden servir a la humanidad] (pp. 621-653). Globethics Publications. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5 (1), 37-45. https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/article/view/103/64
Iskender, A. (2023). Holy or unholy? Interview with Open AI’s ChatGPT. European Journal of Tourism Research, 34, 3414-3414. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169
Jiao, W., Wang, W., Huang, J., Wang, X., & Tu, Z. (2023, November 2). Is ChatGPT a good translator? A preliminary study. arXiv:2301.08745v4. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.08745
Kalla, D., & Smith, N. (2023). Study and analysis of ChatGPT and its impact on different fields of study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8 (3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10250455
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72 (12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Keles, P. U., & Aydin, S. (2021). University students’ perceptions about artificial intelligence. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9, 212-220. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9iS1-May.4014
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020). My teacher is a machine: Understanding students’ perceptions of AI teaching assistants in online education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36 (20), 1902-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227
Kitamura, F.C. (2023). ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment [ChatGPT está dando forma al futuro de la redacción médica, pero aún requiere criterio humano]. Radiology, 307 (2), e230171. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230171
Klutka, J., Ackerly, N., & Magda, A. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in higher education. Current uses and future applications. Learning House.
Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M. D., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13 (18), 10424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424
Lee, H. (2023, March 14). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270
Lee, Y (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), 12 (50), 752-780. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01250
Mathers, N., Fox, N., & Hunn, A. (2002). Trent Focus for research and development in primary health care: Using interviews in a research project. Trent Focus Group.
Megahed, F. M., Chen, Y. J., Ferris, J. A., Knoth, S., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2023, February 17). How generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (mis)used in SPC practice, education, and research? An exploratory study. arXiv:2302.10916v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.10916
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2022, December 23). New modes of learning enabled by AI chatbots: Three methods and assignments. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4300783
Neumann, M., Rauschenberger, M., & Schön, E. M. (2023). “We need to talk about ChatGPT”: The future of AI and higher education. In 2023 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Education for the Next Generation (SEENG) (pp. 29-32). IEEE.
Opara, E., Adalikwu, T., & Aduke, T. C. (2023). ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and challenges. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5 (2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (March 14th release) [Large Language Model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 78 (1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Podstawski, R., Żurawik, M., Borysławski, K., Omelan, A. A., & Tsos, A. (2022). Working conditions of physical education teachers in European higher education institutions. Physical Activity Review, 10 (2), 111-126.https://www.physactiv.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022_10226.pdf
Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1
Raman, R., Mandal, S., Das, P., Kaur, T., Sanjanasri, J. P., & Nedungadi, P. (2023). University students as early adopters of ChatGPT: Innovation diffusion study [Unpublished]. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2734142/v1
Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira, F., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
Rodrigues, M. A., & dos Santos, P. R. (2023, May 1). Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects-to-think-with: A case study. arXiv:2305.02202v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02202
Romero-Rodríguez, J., Ramírez-Montoya, M., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students’ perceived usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12 (2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458
Rose, R. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education. Artificial intelligence and its pedagogical value. Pressbooks.
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. IESALC. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ChatGPT-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_EN_FINAL.pdf
Schiff, D. (2021). Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: The future of artificial intelligence in education. AI & Society, 36, 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8
Sebastian, G. (2023, February 24). Do ChatGPT and other AI chatbots pose a cybersecurity risk? An exploratory study. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4363843
Silva, L. (2007). Post-positivist review of technology acceptance model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8 (4), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00121
Sison, A. J. G., Daza, M. T., Gozalo-Brizuela, R., & Garrido-Merchán, E. C. (2023, April 6). ChatGPT: More than a weapon of mass deception. Ethical challenges and responses from the human-centered artificial intelligence (HCAI) perspective. arXiv:2304.11215v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11215
Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023, 22 de mayo). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735
Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv:2212.09292v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Tian, H., Lu, W., Li, T.O., Tang, X., Cheung, S. C., Klein, J., & Bissyandé, T. F. (2023, August 31). Is ChatGPT the ultimate programming assistant - How far is it? arXiv:2304.11938v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11938
Tiunova, A., & Muñoz, F. (2023, June 28). ChatGPT: Using AI in social studies academic research. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4451612
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40561-023-00237-x
Uludag, K. (2023, March 22). Testing creativity of ChatGPT in psychology: Interview with ChatGPT. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4390872
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19 (7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Woo, J. H., & Choi, H. (2021, October 21). Systematic review for AI-based language learning tools. arXiv:2111.04455v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.04455
Woolf, B. P., Lane, H. C., Chaudhri, V. K., & Kolodner, J. L. (2013). AI grand challenges for education. AI magazine, 34 (4), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i4.2490
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether ChatGPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 2156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, (16), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai, X. (2023, June 4). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
Zhuo, T. Y., Huang, Y., Chen, C., & Xing, Z. (2023, May 29). Exploring AI ethics of ChatGPT: A diagnostic analysis. arXiv:2301.12867v4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12867
Citación recomendada | Recommended citation
Pavlovic, D., Soler-Adillon, J. & Stanisavljevic-Petrovic, Z. (2024). A full-time professor dedicated to you: ChatGPT from university students’ perspective [Un profesor particular a tiempo completo: ChatGPT desde el punto de vista de los estudiantes]. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 82 (289). https:// doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.4160
Licencia Creative Commons | Creative Commons License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Palabras clave | Keywords
artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, university, Spain, Serbia, personalised learning
